+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 116

Thread: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    After the confirmation about the sailing performances of the 123 prototype, even with some remarks about sails, this is the new discussion that continue as "follow on" of the original design.

    The new version I called "ESTEREL" from the sea side area closed to Nice-Cannes region :

    https://www.google.fr/search?q=ester...w=1033&bih=861

    ClaudioD

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    Start with preparation and epoxy bonding of the false plywood deck 3mm thick.
    As can be note, no reverse bow for this female mold. It is not excluded a modification for a second two parts female mold among others implementations as bowed deck a roof.
    ClaudioD
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	E-001.jpg‎
Views:	267
Size:	594.7 KB
ID:	11876   Click image for larger version

Name:	E-002.jpg‎
Views:	220
Size:	742.1 KB
ID:	11877   Click image for larger version

Name:	E-003.jpg‎
Views:	208
Size:	600.5 KB
ID:	11878   Click image for larger version

Name:	E-004.jpg‎
Views:	232
Size:	581.6 KB
ID:	11879   Click image for larger version

Name:	E-005.jpg‎
Views:	196
Size:	664.2 KB
ID:	11880  


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gulf Harbour, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,242

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    Claudio,

    I will never forget this name Esterel Massif being mountain range is south-east costal part of France that you personally showed me, that have soil and rocks in the mountain range of volcanic origin, composed mainly of porphyry, which I understand gives the hills that distinctive red colour that flows from the mountains into beautiful bays & beaches in the region.

    Following my visit the name “Esterel” now has three meanings for me, 1) it represents location of your home and 2) the red hull colour represents the volcanic red colour in the region and 3) the name Esterel is also given to programming language for the development of complex reactive systems suited for model design, which in my mind represents your supreme model boat design and building skills.

    All these are the 123 ingridents of the prototype project now given a boat name Esterel that I know will be the very best in model boat design, construction & sailing and your legacy to the model sailing community for many many years to come.

    On behalf of all the people who will be building Esterel and enjoy sailing her in the future, I want to thank you in advance in sharing your gift with us.

    Cheers Alan
    You can only create, what you can imagine

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    Tanks a lot Alan for the words, probably you have discovered part of my way of thinking.
    Passionate for white sail on the sea since little boy, like being the symbol of freedom !.
    Learned only a little of the infinite sailing subjects.
    As retired it keep me occupied and as you says well, I like to share my limited knowledge with others hoping to transmit my passion.
    I always liked experimenting and the boats are good laboratories !

    ESTEREL is a small area of my region that got a large impact on my subconscious since the first time I discovered it several years ago. Today I'm very happy to leave so close.
    ESTEREL is the name I decided recently to give to my last design. It may happen that "Esterel" will be the name given to a series of models of various size, as recently found out with you in Cannes when I discovered the 'Moro di Venezia' !!! hum !! that was a Maxi Yacht and not the red/white America Cup boat of San Diego.
    With the actual ESTEREL, the 123 will be kept on the sails. One day could be ESTEREL with 'M' on the sails or RG65 or what else.
    Thank you again
    Cheers
    ClaudioD

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    False deck bonded.
    Soft sanding with 800 grade.
    First wax !
    ClaudioD
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	E-006.jpg‎
Views:	172
Size:	604.6 KB
ID:	11896   Click image for larger version

Name:	E-007.jpg‎
Views:	181
Size:	551.6 KB
ID:	11897   Click image for larger version

Name:	E-008.jpg‎
Views:	175
Size:	559.4 KB
ID:	11898  
    Last edited by claudio; 10-05-2012 at 09:38 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Quebec, CANADA
    Posts
    108

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    Dear Claudio,

    It's working, you do indeed transmit you passion! Also, it requires a good understanding of a subject in order to realize its complexity, and appreciate its difficulties. Your "limited knowledge" is only the proof of your wisdom.

    I was a bit surprise to learn that your first Esterel will use the previous hull. I guess this is a great token of its high balance and performances. Can you give us then a preview of the novelties you intend to introduce on this first Esterel, and the rational behind them?

    Thanks again for your contibution to the R/C model sailing community.
    Last edited by symont; 10-06-2012 at 09:41 AM.
    Sylvain

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    Hi Sylvain,
    indeed the test made with the wind range of last week from 5-6kt at the beginning up to 12-14kt with gust up to 15-16kt gave me the insurance about the model quality.
    Before that test I was supposing to introduce eventually modifications like the "reversed bow" as well a "flared bow" to tackle the pitching effects.
    The wind was sufficiently high to keep on track the boat, therefore non pitching observed. I do not exclude that with lower wind force, it could happen, thus, there is a provision to add, close to the bow, an internal ballast adjustable up to 200g.
    This option imply a water plan sink variation of about 1.5mm and a LWL increase of about 12mm.
    This configuration is very close to the launch testing condition because of the actual prototype weight of 4230g.

    The other modifications, under analysis, concern the type of servo configuration to be used. The image in the film when the Eurgle servo didn't managed to pull the main is still impress in my head. I used two separate winches just because I was fearing that event !
    On the other hand, until I'm not sure to keep the construction weight sufficiently down in order to have margin for an MRG servo, I'm searching for a back up solution including cost reduction.
    The simplest solution for the moment is the servo arm, another is referring to a modified servo with a large drum.

    That's for the moment !

    Cheers
    ClaudioD

    PS : I was passing the material order to make the mold, when my supplier proposed a very good polyester filler that allow a super finish with 1500-2000 grade sanding paper. I stopped the wax application after the second layer !

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    This is the starting point for the servo choice,
    Document prepared with Word.



    ClaudioD
    Last edited by claudio; 10-06-2012 at 03:29 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toulouse (Fra)
    Posts
    3,289

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    The ESTEREL Boom Plan is depicted below.
    This plan establish the sheet length required and consider the two servo options :


    It result that a 24kg servo arm as detailed in the drawing is not sufficient to control the sail area of 0.77mē under 20kt of wind and this is explained below .

    Here the schematic I use to calculate the power needed for the servo arm.
    The sheet length according to the ESTEREL configuration is 270mm
    The servo have generally a swing angle of 120° .
    With an arm of 79mm is obtained 136mm travel.
    Since a dual pulley is used the total sheet length obtained is: 136 x 2 = 272mm
    With that configuration the pulling power is also divided by 2.
    The pull force calculated from the wind pressure graphic is 6.5kgforce with 20knots wind speed.
    Because of the Main boom arm lever principle , the pull force required at the anchoring point is : 1.44kg force.
    It is necessary to consider that the servo power is given for no load conditions and friction of the circuit, there fore I take a multiplying factor for security of 1.5.

    Thus under such conditions I can establish the servo power needed :
    1.44 x 1.5 for security x 2 because of arm dual pulley x 7.9cm arm length = 34.12 Kg.cm

    .....

    To reduce the servo power, it is possible to increase the distance from the Main boom pivoting point.
    In that manner the Pull Force at the anchor point is lower. There is a drawback because the sheet length increase and therefore it is necessary to increase the arm length or increase the swing angle. To note that over 140° swing the system loose efficiency.

    Another important consideration is the direct Bernoulli formula application. The wind angle of attack is not included since the the formula is referred to an orthogonal plan.
    I personally have a sympathy for the formula used for the Kites depicted in previous post where the sine of the angle can be introduced.
    Which of the formula is more realistic for a sail I'm not sufficient competent to tell.
    Probably there are some additional margins there too.
    Any competent advise will be useful !
    Thank you
    ClaudioD
    Last edited by claudio; 10-07-2012 at 02:39 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    439

    Default Re: 1.2.3. - "esterel"

    The amount of pressure on the sheet is at maximum at close hauled. It drops significantly for halfway out (beam reach) and approaches zero for full out (dead run) - especially if the boom hits the shrouds.

    As the pressure is greatest at close hauled, it is important to align the sheet along the servo arm, such that the pressure is aligned with the bearing of the servo and not relying on the electrics. Another advantage of getting the alignment is that it provides automatic fine tuning at the close hauled position and becomes coarser as the approach angle increases.

    One problem with converting an arm to a large wheel is that the force is never aligned, as it is tangential to the wheel and always exerts a force on the electrics of the servo. There is a way to set up a wheel for reduced pressure on the servo that I posted on the 1.2.3 thread.

    John
    John Ball
    CRYA #895
    IOM CAN 307 V8

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Build Log - first r/c sailboat - "Brandoed" Cobra
    By aldesso in forum General Discussion (Footy)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-02-2012, 02:41 PM
  2. German Mini40 Trimaran "Nightmare Mk.VIII"-kit buildlog
    By disabled in forum General Discussions (MultiHull/MultiOne)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2011, 05:48 AM
  3. How the development of "Nightmare Mk.VII+Mk.VIII" leaded to "Mk.IX+ Mk.X"!
    By disabled in forum General Discussions (MultiHull/MultiOne)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2011, 12:27 PM
  4. "Trilogy" Kiwi Mini40 build log
    By Morspeed in forum General Discussions (MultiHull/MultiOne)
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-19-2010, 06:04 PM
  5. Japanese Footy "ShaQ" on FOOTY website "Photos"
    By JPN-001 in forum General Discussion (Footy)
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 01:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts